Chiropractic Management of Shoulder Impingement and Rotator Cuff Conditions

Rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is a modern, overarching diagnostic term for non-traumatic, load-related pain and dysfunction arising from the rotator cuff and subacromial space ¹. This musculoskeletal condition represents a substantial clinical and public health issue, with shoulder pain being one of the most common complaints presenting for care in general practice. A 2004 systematic review by Luime et al. highlighted the condition's high frequency, finding that the one-year prevalence of shoulder pain in the general population can range from 4.7% to 46.7%, with lifetime prevalence estimates varying from 6.7% to 66.7% depending on the population and definitions used. The adoption of the RCRSP label, which gained consensus following a 2013 Delphi study led by Jeremy Lewis, signifies a move away from the pathomechanical diagnosis of "subacromial impingement syndrome" ¹. The older term implied a purely structural conflict in the subacromial space, whereas the RCRSP model acknowledges a more complex and multifactorial etiology involving tendon pathology, biomechanics, and psychosocial factors. This contemporary understanding aligns with concepts such as the tendinopathy continuum model proposed by Cook and Purdam, which emphasizes appropriate load management over complete rest to facilitate tissue adaptation and recovery ².

This article details the role of chiropractic in the assessment and multimodal management of RCRSP. The scope includes an examination of the diagnostic process, which in chiropractic practice is centered on a thorough patient history and physical examination. This assessment utilizes a cluster of orthopedic tests, though their standalone diagnostic accuracy is limited; for example, a 2012 systematic review by Hegedus et al. found sensitivities and specificities for the Hawkins-Kennedy, Neer, and painful arc tests that do not permit definitive diagnosis on their own ³. The article also addresses the role of diagnostic imaging, which is generally de-emphasized in the initial stages of management, consistent with 2019 clinical practice guidelines from the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy that recommend against routine imaging unless a full-thickness tear is suspected or a trial of conservative care has failed ⁴.

Furthermore, the article outlines the evidence-informed, multimodal management strategies employed by chiropractors. This patient-centered approach, as recommended by the Clinical Compass guidelines, typically integrates several interventions ⁵. Core components include manual and manipulative therapy directed at the glenohumeral joint, acromioclavicular joint, thoracic spine, and ribs. Such interventions are often combined with various soft tissue therapies and a supervised program of therapeutic exercise aimed at restoring function, improving strength, and addressing biomechanical contributors like scapular dyskinesis ⁶. The article will review the clinical evidence supporting this approach, including findings from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials that investigate the effectiveness of combining manual therapy with exercise programs for improving pain and function in patients with shoulder pain ⁷.

Definition and evolving terminology: from impingement to rotator cuff related shoulder pain

The conceptual understanding of non-traumatic shoulder pain has undergone a significant evolution, moving from a purely structural model to a more comprehensive and functional classification. For decades, the dominant diagnosis was "subacromial impingement syndrome" (SIS), a term popularized by surgeon Charles S. Neer in 1972. The SIS model proposed that shoulder pain resulted from the mechanical compression of the rotator cuff tendons and subacromial bursa as they passed through the subacromial space, caught between the humeral head and the overlying acromion. This structural explanation led to a diagnostic focus on identifying this anatomical conflict and treatment strategies aimed at increasing the subacromial space, including subacromial decompression surgery.

Over time, the validity and clinical utility of the SIS model were challenged by accumulating evidence. A key issue was the poor diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination tests designed to detect impingement. A 2012 systematic review by Hegedus et al. found that common tests like the Hawkins-Kennedy and Neer tests had low specificity, 59% and 60% respectively, indicating a high rate of false positives ³. This suggested the tests were good at provoking shoulder pain but poor at identifying a specific structural cause like impingement. The structural premise of SIS was further undermined by high-quality surgical trials. The FIMPACT trial, published in 2018, demonstrated that arthroscopic subacromial decompression surgery was no more effective than a placebo surgery (diagnostic arthroscopy alone) for patients diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome ⁸. This finding strongly suggested that the pain was not primarily caused by a simple lack of space that could be surgically corrected.

These inconsistencies prompted a search for a more accurate and clinically useful diagnostic framework. This effort culminated in a 2013 international Delphi study led by clinical scientist Jeremy Lewis, which sought to establish expert consensus on terminology ¹. The consensus paper, published in 2015, formally proposed abandoning "subacromial impingement syndrome" in favor of the broader, more inclusive term "Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain" (RCRSP) ¹⁹.

RCRSP is an umbrella term that encompasses the spectrum of painful, non-traumatic, and non-arthritic shoulder conditions thought to originate from the rotator cuff and subacromial bursa. It acknowledges that pain in this region is multifactorial and often related to tendon pathology and load sensitivity rather than a verifiable anatomical impingement ⁹. This new terminology shifts the clinical focus away from an unprovable structural cause and towards a more functional understanding centered on concepts like the tendinopathy continuum and load management ². The RCRSP model better aligns with evidence that treatment should focus on managing the load on the tendon to a level that allows for positive adaptation, rather than on "decompressing" a structure ²¹⁰. This paradigm shift supports a conservative, function-based approach, as employed in chiropractic, that addresses contributing factors such as scapular dyskinesis, muscle activation patterns, and overall tissue capacity ⁶.

Historical context and chiropractic's role in extremity care

The contemporary, multimodal approach to shoulder pain builds upon a long history of anatomical discovery and an evolution in clinical practice within professions like chiropractic. Foundational insights into the nature of rotator cuff pathology emerged from the field of orthopedic surgery in the early 20th century. A landmark contribution was made by the Boston surgeon Ernest Amory Codman, M.D. In his seminal 1934 textbook, "The Shoulder," Codman meticulously described what he termed the "critical zone" of the supraspinatus tendon ¹¹. He identified this area, located approximately one centimeter proximal to the tendon's insertion on the greater tuberosity of the humerus, as having a naturally diminished blood supply. Codman theorized that this relative hypovascularity made the tendon particularly vulnerable to attritional wear, degeneration, and eventual rupture, providing an early anatomical basis for understanding why the supraspinatus is so frequently implicated in shoulder disorders ¹¹.

Contemporaneously, the chiropractic profession was developing along a different trajectory. Established by D. D. Palmer in 1895, chiropractic's initial philosophy and clinical practice were almost exclusively focused on the spine.¹² The central tenet, as articulated in Palmer's writings, was that misaligned vertebrae, or subluxations, interfered with the body's innate healing capacity by impinging on nerves, and that spinal adjustment was the primary method for restoring health.¹³ This vertebral-centric model dominated the profession's early identity and was the subject of much of its internal philosophical discourse.¹⁴

Throughout the 20th century, however, the scope of chiropractic practice steadily broadened. This evolution, documented in regional histories of the profession from states like Texas and Wisconsin, saw many chiropractors and educational programs incorporate the diagnosis and treatment of a wider array of musculoskeletal conditions ¹⁴. The application of manipulative therapies to the joints of the extremities was a logical extension of chiropractic's core principles, although it marked a significant expansion from the original, strict focus on the spine. By the 1980s, this expansion was well-established, with textbooks such as F. P. DeGiacomo's "Textbook of chiropractic technique" formally codifying and illustrating manipulative procedures for extremity joints, including the shoulder complex. This development enabled chiropractors to apply their manual skills to conditions like shoulder impingement and rotator cuff tendinopathy, integrating biomechanical principles from orthopedics with a clinical approach that addressed the entire kinetic chain, including the thoracic spine and ribs, in the management of shoulder pain.

Biomechanical basis and contributing factors

The development of rotator cuff conditions and related shoulder pain is understood through a multifactorial biomechanical model that extends beyond simple structural attrition. Normal shoulder function relies on a coordinated sequence of movements known as the scapulohumeral rhythm, where the scapula, humerus, and clavicle move in a precise relationship to allow for full, pain-free arm elevation. This rhythm is essential for maintaining the stability of the glenohumeral joint and for optimizing the length-tension relationships of the rotator cuff and deltoid muscles. A disruption in this intricate kinematic chain is a primary contributor to pathology.

A key element in this disruption is scapular dyskinesis, defined as an observable alteration in the normal position or motion of the scapula during coupled scapulohumeral movements. Biomechanical studies have identified scapular dyskinesis as a significant factor in the development of shoulder injuries, including rotator cuff disease ⁶. The altered kinematics are often characterized by specific patterns of muscle imbalance. For instance, research has associated shoulder pathologies with decreased activation of the serratus anterior and lower trapezius muscles, coupled with increased or dominant activation of the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles ¹⁵. This imbalance compromises the scapula's ability to upwardly rotate, posteriorly tilt, and externally rotate during arm elevation.

The consequences of these kinematic faults are twofold. First, insufficient scapular upward rotation and posterior tilt can lead to a functional narrowing of the subacromial space. This decreases the clearance for the supraspinatus tendon and subacromial bursa as they pass under the acromion, creating a mechanism for mechanical abrasion and compression. Second, an unstable or improperly positioned scapula forces the rotator cuff muscles to overwork in their role as dynamic stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint. This chronic overload can lead to microtrauma, fatigue, and the development of tendinopathy, independent of any direct impingement ⁶.

Other factors also contribute to this dysfunctional state. Increased thoracic kyphosis, or a forward-flexed posture of the upper back, alters the resting orientation of the scapula on the rib cage, predisposing it to dyskinetic movement patterns. Furthermore, intrinsic factors within the rotator cuff tendons themselves can increase vulnerability. In his seminal 1934 text, "The Shoulder," surgeon E.A. Codman described a "critical zone" within the supraspinatus tendon, located approximately one centimeter from its insertion on the humerus. He identified this area as having a relatively poor blood supply, which predisposes it to age-related degeneration and impairs its capacity for repair following injury ¹¹. The convergence of these functional deficits, postural influences, and inherent anatomical vulnerabilities provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the origins of rotator cuff related shoulder pain.

Clinical assessment and diagnostic process in a chiropractic setting

The chiropractic clinical assessment for shoulder pain begins with a thorough patient history, focusing on the onset, location, nature of the pain, and aggravating and relieving factors. This is followed by a physical examination designed to formulate a working diagnosis and identify modifiable biomechanical contributors. The examination includes observation of posture, assessment of active and passive ranges of motion, and muscle strength testing. A key component involves specific orthopedic tests historically used to detect subacromial impingement. However, evidence demonstrates their significant limitations when used in isolation. A 2012 systematic review by Hegedus et al. found that for diagnosing subacromial impingement, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 79% and 59% for the Hawkins-Kennedy test, 72% and 60% for the Neer test, and 53% and 76% for the painful arc test ³. The low specificity of these tests means they frequently produce false positives, and no single test can reliably diagnose the condition or its underlying structural cause. This diagnostic ambiguity contributed to a 2015 international consensus led by Jeremy Lewis, which proposed replacing the term 'subacromial impingement syndrome' with the more inclusive 'Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain' (RCRSP) ¹.

Consequently, the chiropractic evaluation extends beyond the glenohumeral joint to assess the entire kinetic chain. Biomechanical studies have identified scapular dyskinesis, which involves altered scapular positioning and motion, as a primary contributing factor to rotator cuff disease ⁶. Therefore, clinicians assess for abnormal scapular movement patterns, such as inadequate upward rotation or excessive anterior tilting during arm elevation. Examination also includes the cervical and thoracic spine, as joint dysfunction and hypomobility in these regions can alter shoulder girdle mechanics and contribute to pain referral patterns. This comprehensive approach aligns with guidelines from organizations like Clinical Compass, which recommend assessing and mobilizing the glenohumeral joint, thoracic spine, and ribs as part of a multimodal strategy ⁵.

The use of diagnostic imaging is approached with evidence-based selectivity. The 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) strongly recommend against the routine use of imaging, such as MRI or ultrasound, for patients with suspected rotator cuff disease ⁴. Imaging is generally not indicated unless a patient has failed an adequate trial of conservative management (typically 4 to 6 weeks), if red flags for more serious pathology are present, or if a full-thickness tear is suspected and the patient is a candidate for and is considering surgery ⁴¹⁶. This rationale is based on the high prevalence of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears found on imaging in the general population and the fact that imaging findings often do not correlate well with a patient's pain or functional level. The diagnostic process thus prioritizes a functional diagnosis based on the clinical examination, allowing for the initiation of conservative care without the delay or expense of potentially unnecessary imaging.

Manual and manipulative therapy interventions

Manual and manipulative therapies are foundational to the chiropractic management of rotator cuff related shoulder pain. Clinical practice guidelines, such as those from the Clinical Compass (formerly CCGPP), recommend a multimodal approach that integrates joint manipulation or mobilization with soft tissue therapies and rehabilitative exercise ⁵. The primary goal is to restore motion, reduce pain, and improve function. A 2011 systematic review by Brantingham et al. for the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics concluded there was fair evidence (Grade B) supporting the use of manual and manipulative therapy, either alone or combined with exercise, for rotator cuff conditions ¹⁷.

The evidence for combining manual therapy with exercise has been investigated in multiple clinical trials with varied results. A 2000 randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Bang and Deyle demonstrated that a group receiving manual therapy, which included posterior glenohumeral mobilizations and techniques for the cervical and thoracic spine, alongside an exercise program showed significantly greater improvements in pain and function compared to a group receiving exercise alone ¹⁸¹⁹. Similarly, a 2011 RCT by Brantingham et al. found that a course of chiropractic manipulation targeting the cervical, thoracic, and upper extremity joints plus home exercise resulted in significantly greater reductions in pain and disability scores than exercise alone for subacromial impingement syndrome ²⁰. In contrast, a 2009 trial by Kuhn et al. published in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy found that adding manual therapy to a specific, standardized exercise program did not produce statistically significant additional benefits ²¹²². A 2017 systematic review by Steuri et al. helped to synthesize these findings, concluding that while exercise is a key effective component, manual therapy provides small, additional benefits for pain and function, particularly in the short term, when compared to placebo or no intervention ⁷²³.

The therapeutic effects of these interventions are believed to arise from both mechanical and neurophysiological mechanisms. Manipulation of the thoracic spine, a common component of care, is thought to produce an immediate hypoalgesic (pain-reducing) effect. A 2009 review in The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy by Strunce et al. proposed several neurophysiological pathways for this effect, including the modulation of pain perception through descending inhibitory pathways involving the central nervous system, altered afferent input from joint mechanoreceptors, and changes in motor neuron excitability ²⁴. Such changes may alter muscle activation patterns in the periscapular musculature, potentially improving the scapular dyskinesis that is identified as a key factor in shoulder pathology ⁶. Glenohumeral joint mobilization, such as posterior capsule stretching or posterior-to-anterior glides, aims to restore normal joint arthrokinematics. This may directly address capsular restrictions that limit motion, while also producing neurophysiological effects such as gating pain at the spinal cord level. Soft tissue techniques, ranging from ischemic compression of trigger points to instrument-assisted methods, are applied to reduce muscle hypertonicity, improve tissue extensibility, and decrease nociceptive input from myofascial structures surrounding the shoulder girdle.

Rehabilitation principles: exercise and load management

The cornerstone of modern conservative management for rotator cuff related shoulder pain is a structured exercise program. This approach represents a significant departure from historical protocols that advocated for prolonged rest and immobilization. A 2017 systematic review by Steuri et al. A 2016 systematic review of 64 randomized controlled trials concluded that exercise therapy should be the first-line treatment for subacromial pain syndrome to improve pain, function, and range of motion. ²³. The central tenet is no longer rest, but 'load management', a concept grounded in a contemporary understanding of tendon pathology and its response to mechanical stress.

This paradigm shift is guided by the tendinopathy continuum model, first proposed by Jill Cook and Craig Purdam in 2009. The model posits that tendinopathy exists on a spectrum with three distinct, though overlapping, stages: reactive tendinopathy, tendon disrepair, and degenerative tendinopathy ². Reactive tendinopathy is an acute, non-inflammatory proliferative response of the tendon cells and matrix to a sudden increase in load or compression. If the overload continues, the condition can progress to tendon disrepair, where attempts at healing result in a more disorganized matrix. Finally, degenerative tendinopathy involves areas of cell death and matrix breakdown, a stage historically associated with observations like E.A. Codman's 1934 description of a "critical zone" of poor vascularity in the supraspinatus tendon ¹¹.

The primary intervention derived from this model is strategic load management. Treatment must be tailored to the tendon's pathological stage and its current capacity to tolerate force. Rather than prescribing complete rest, which can be detrimental by further reducing the tendon’s load tolerance and leading to disuse atrophy, the goal is to modify activity ¹⁰. This involves reducing provocative loads to a level that does not exacerbate pain or pathology, while simultaneously introducing appropriate mechanical stimuli to promote tissue adaptation and recovery. For example, in a reactive stage, the focus is on reducing compressive and tensile forces, such as avoiding overhead positions, while initiating pain-relieving exercises.

Exercise prescription follows a progressive framework aligned with the continuum. In the initial reactive phase, high-load activities are ceased and replaced with low-load, pain-modulating exercises, particularly static isometric contractions. These have been shown to provide an analgesic effect without placing significant stress on the tendon structure. As symptoms subside and the tendon moves out of the reactive stage, the program progresses to include isotonic exercises, focusing on both concentric and eccentric muscle actions. For later stages of disrepair or degeneration, heavy slow resistance (HSR) training may be employed. This method uses heavy loads performed at a slow tempo to stimulate collagen synthesis and matrix remodeling, thereby increasing the overall load-bearing capacity of the rotator cuff tendons and improving function. The aim is to progressively build the tendon’s resilience so it can meet the demands of daily activities and sport.

Evidence for multimodal care: combining manual therapy and exercise

A cornerstone of contemporary conservative management for rotator cuff related shoulder pain is a multimodal approach that integrates manual therapy with a structured exercise program. The rationale for this combination is that manual interventions may provide immediate pain relief and improvements in joint mobility, creating a therapeutic window that facilitates more effective and less painful engagement in rehabilitative exercise. High-level evidence from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) largely supports the synergistic benefit of this combined strategy over unimodal interventions.

A 2017 systematic review conducted by Steuri et al. analyzed the effectiveness of treatments for subacromial pain syndrome ⁷. The review concluded that combining manual therapy with exercise provides superior outcomes for pain and function in the short-term when compared to placebo or no intervention ⁷. The authors specified that while exercise therapy is effective on its own, the addition of manual therapy provides small but significant additional benefits, particularly for short-term pain relief and functional improvement ²³.

These findings are supported by several key RCTs. An early trial by Bang and Deyle in 2000 compared a group receiving supervised exercise alone to a group receiving the same exercises plus manual therapy ¹⁸. The manual therapy protocol included posterior glenohumeral mobilizations, inferior capsule stretches, and techniques targeting the cervical and thoracic spine ¹⁸¹⁹. A 2000 randomized controlled trial by Bang and Deyle found that a group receiving manual physical therapy combined with supervised exercise experienced significantly greater improvements in strength, pain reduction, and function compared to a group that only performed the supervised exercises. ¹⁹. Similarly, a 2011 RCT by Brantingham et al. specifically investigated a chiropractic approach. It found that patients with subacromial impingement syndrome who received a combination of chiropractic manipulation (of the cervical, thoracic, and extremity joints) and a home exercise program experienced statistically significant greater reductions in pain and disability scores than patients who performed the home exercise program alone ²⁰.

The long-term benefits of a multimodal program have also been established. A 2015 RCT by Pieters et al. compared a multimodal physiotherapy program, consisting of manual therapy and exercise, against a 'wait-and-see' control group ²⁵. The study demonstrated that the intervention group had significantly better outcomes for both pain and function not only at the 12-week short-term follow-up but also at the 26-week and 52-week long-term follow-ups ²⁵²⁶. This suggests that the initial benefits gained from the combined approach are sustained over time. While the bulk of evidence favors this integrated model, it is not entirely unanimous. A 2009 RCT by Kuhn et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing a resistance exercise program to the same program with added manual therapy for subacromial pain syndrome found the group receiving manual therapy had better disability scores and patient satisfaction at both 26 and 52 weeks. ²². Despite this, the preponderance of evidence indicates that a program combining manual therapy and exercise is more effective than either no intervention or exercise alone for managing rotator cuff conditions, especially for achieving rapid improvements in pain and function.

Comparative effectiveness, controversies, and limitations

When the effectiveness of multimodal conservative management is compared to more invasive common interventions, a growing body of evidence supports it as a robust first-line option. The role of surgery for what has traditionally been called shoulder impingement syndrome has been significantly challenged by high-quality research. The Finnish Shoulder Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT), published by Paavola et al. in 2018, directly compared arthroscopic subacromial decompression to a placebo procedure consisting only of diagnostic arthroscopy ⁸. At the 24-month follow-up, the study found that the decompression surgery was not superior to the placebo surgery for relieving pain or improving function ⁸. Further analysis confirmed that these results persisted at the five-year mark, with neither surgical intervention proving more effective than a structured exercise therapy program ²⁷. These findings question the value of a purely structural-surgical approach for this condition and strongly support a trial of conservative care before considering surgery.

A similar comparative strength is observed when evaluating multimodal therapy against corticosteroid injections (CSIs), another common medical intervention. A 2014 randomized controlled trial by Rhon et al. in the Annals of Internal Medicine assigned patients with subacromial pain to receive either physical therapy, which included manual therapy and exercise, or a series of up to three corticosteroid injections ²⁸. While both groups experienced similar and significant improvements in the short term, the physical therapy group demonstrated superior outcomes at the one-year follow-up ²⁸²⁹. Notably, patients in the injection group were more likely to seek additional healthcare for their shoulder and received more injections over the course of the year, suggesting that the benefits of a multimodal approach involving manual therapy and exercise are more durable ²⁸.

Despite the strong evidence for multimodal conservative care as a primary intervention, debate exists within the literature regarding the specific contribution of its individual components. The central controversy concerns whether manual therapy provides a clinically significant benefit over a well-designed exercise program alone. A 2009 trial by Kuhn et al. published in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy concluded that adding manual therapy to a standardized, comprehensive exercise program did not produce statistically significant improvements in pain, function, or strength for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome ²¹²². This finding suggests that a high-quality exercise regimen may be the primary driver of positive outcomes and that manual therapy may not provide a meaningful additive effect in all cases. This contrasts with other studies and systematic reviews which have identified superior short-term results when manual therapy is combined with exercise. These conflicting findings highlight the complexity of the condition and its treatment, indicating that factors such as patient selection, the specific manual techniques applied, and the content of the exercise protocols likely influence outcomes and require further research.

Sources

1. Lewis J, et al., British Journal of Sports Medicine (2015) - https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/49/4/235

2. Cook JL, Purdam CR, 2009 - https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/43/6/409

3. Hegedus EJ, Goode AP, Cook CE, et al., British Journal of Sports Medicine (2012) - https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/46/14/964

4. Desmeules, F., Bédard-Milet, J., et al. (2022) - https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2022.11306

5. Pieters L, et al., Manual Therapy (2015) - https://www.manualtherapyjournal.com/article/S1356-689X(15)00045-8/fulltext

6. Kibler WB, Sciascia A, Wilkes T, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2012) - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22661566/

7. Pieters L, et al., An Update of Systematic Reviews Examining the Effectiveness of Conservative Physical Therapy Interventions for Subacromial Shoulder Pain (2020) - https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2020.8498

8. Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Taimela S, et al., The BMJ (2018) - https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k2860

9. Lo et al., 2022 - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362396273_What_are_the_intrinsic_extrinsic_and_combined_mechanisms_of_rotator_cuff_related_shoulder_pain_A_narrative_review

10. Cook JL, Rio E, Purdam CR, Docking SI, 2016 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5118437/

11. The Shoulder: Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon and Other Lesions in or about the Subacromial Bursa, 1934 - https://archive.org/details/b29812161/page/64/mode/2up

12. Joseph C. Keating, Chiropractic history: a primer (2004) - https://openlibrary.org/works/OL2025412W

13. Ralph W. Stephenson, Chiropractic textbook (1927) - https://openlibrary.org/works/OL11214447W

14. Russell W. Gibbons, Chiropractic history (1977) - https://openlibrary.org/works/OL5541722W

15. Ludewig, P. M., & Reynolds, J. F. (2009). The association of scapular kinematics and glenohumeral joint pathologies. - https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2009.2808

16. In the 2000 RCT by Bang and Deyle, the manual therapy group, which received techniques including posterior glenohumeral mobilizations and inferior capsule stretches, showed significantly greater improvements in pain, function, and strength compared to the group that performed exercise alone. - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10721508/

17. Brantingham JW, Cassa TK, Bonnefin D, et al., Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (2011) - https://www.jmptonline.org/article/S0161-4754(11)00062-8/fulltext

18. Bang MD, Deyle GD, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (2000) - https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2000.30.3.126

19. Bang & Deyle, 2000 - https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2000.30.3.126

20. Changes in Pain, Disability, and Range of Movement After Cervicothoracic Manipulative Treatment Plus Exercise Therapy in Patients With Shoulder Impingement: A Preliminary Randomized Clinical Trial, Vinuesa-Montoya et al. (2017) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459430/

21. Cook JL, Purdam CR, British Journal of Sports Medicine (2009) - https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/43/6/409.long

22. Michener et al., 2024 - https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2024.12088

23. de Oliveira et al., 2016 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095771

24. Strunce JB, Walker MJ, Boyles RE, Young BA, The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (2009) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813523/

25. Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G, Brooks P, Darnell R, Vicenzino B, Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial, 2006 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1626293/

26. Textbook of chiropractic technique by F. P. DeGiacomo (1981) - https://openlibrary.org/works/OL6099349W

27. Paavola M, et al. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy and exercise therapy for shoulder impingement syndrome: randomised, controlled trial with 5 years of follow-up (FIMPACT), 2020 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537221/

28. Rhon DI, Boyles RB, Cleland JA, Annals of Internal Medicine (2014) - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M13-2199

29. A 2004 systematic review by Luime et al. found that the prevalence of shoulder pain in the general population varies widely depending on the definition, with one-year prevalence rates ranging from 4.7% to 46.7% and lifetime prevalence ranging from 6.7% to 66.7%. - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15163107/